Why you are promoting a far-right publication seems counter to what I thought you stood for, you know, credibility. I mean really, just read the headline.

Two thirds of this piece is a dry and uninteresting description of the panel she moderated; the use of “failed” in the headline and the penultimate two paragraphs seem right-wing grievances that are the purpose of the story In saying that she refused to concede multiple times, the Daily Caller intentionally omits her words a few days after the election, acknowledging “that former of Secretary of State Brian Kemp will be certified the victor” while she did not call it a concession. The omission leaves the impression that she is unable to deal with reality, and Dems are OK with that. And those implications from the partial-story seem intended to create an emotional response, with the seeming intent of hijacking some blah, mundane details of the panel itself, a story that only a few wonks or fans of Ms Abrams would find interesting in the least