Name: Louisiana Supreme Court Won't Review Life Sentence For Man Who Stole Hedge Clippers
Brand: npr.org
SKU: npr-org-842
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Louisiana Supreme Court Won't Review Life Sentence For Man Who Stole Hedge Clippers

preview

Louisiana Supreme Court Won't Review Life Sentence For Man Who Stole Hedge Clippers In a dissent, Chief Justice Bernette Johnson compared Fair Wayne Bryant's sentence to "Pig Laws" in the years after Reconstruction, which enacted harsh penalties for theft and other petty crimes.A Louisiana man will continue to spend his life in prison for stealing a pair of hedge clippers, after the state's Supreme Court his request to review a lower court's sentence. Fair Wayne Bryant was convicted in 1997 of stealing the hedge clippers. Prosecutors pursued and won a life sentence in the case, a penalty permissible under the state's habitual offender law. Bryant the life sentence as too severe. Chief Justice Bernette Johnson was the sole dissenter in the court's decision last week, that Bryant's sentence is "excessive and disproportionate to the offense" — and that it was costing the state a lot of money to keep him imprisoned. "Since his conviction in 1997, Mr. Bryant's incarceration has cost Louisiana taxpayers approximately $518,667," she wrote. "Arrested at 38, Mr. Bryant has already spent nearly 23 years in prison and is now over 60 years old. If he lives another 20 years, Louisiana taxpayers will have paid almost one million dollars to punish Mr. Bryant for his failed effort to steal a set of hedge clippers."Bryant, who is Black, had four prior convictions. Only the first was violent: an attempted armed robbery in 1979, for which he was sentenced to 10 years hard labor. His subsequent convictions were for possession of stolen property in 1987, attempted forgery of a $150 check in 1989 and burglary of a house in 1992. "Each of these crimes was an effort to steal something. Such petty theft is frequently driven by the ravages of poverty or addiction, and often both," Johnson wrote in her dissent. "It is cruel and unusual to impose a sentence of life in prison at hard labor for the criminal behavior which is most often caused by poverty or addiction." is the court's second female African American justice and its first African American chief justice. The court's are all . None offered written rulings explaining their decisions. The court's decision was first by The Lens, a nonprofit news site in New Orleans. The Lens' Nicholas Chrastil reports: "Louisiana's ... have long been criticized for sanctioning and in the state. Nearly in Louisiana prisons under the habitual offender laws ... are Black." In her dissent, Johnson connected Bryant's sentence to the "" and Black Codes in the years after Reconstruction, which enacted harsh penalties for theft and other petty crimes."Pig Laws were largely designed to re-enslave African Americans," she wrote. Bryant's case, the chief justice said, demonstrates a "modern manifestation" of Pig Laws: "This man's life sentence for a failed attempt to steal a set of hedge clippers is grossly out of proportion to the crime and serves no legitimate penal purpose."Sponsor Message

Louisiana Supreme Court Won't Review Life Sentence For Man Who Stole Hedge Clippers In a dissent, Chief Justice Bernette Johnson compared Fair Wayne Bryant's sentence to "Pig Laws" in the years after Reconstruction, which enacted harsh penalties for theft and other petty crimes.A Louisiana man will continue to spend his life in prison for stealing a pair of hedge clippers, after the state's Supreme Court his request to review a lower court's sentence. Fair Wayne Bryant was convicted in 1997 of stealing the hedge clippers. Prosecutors pursued and won a life sentence in the case, a penalty...

public

Reporter for @NPR covering Covid-19 and more. Always thinking about cities, bikes, and soccer.

Laurel Wamsley

News. Arts & Life. Music & more. This is NPR. 🕵️ Securely send us news tips: http://securedrop.npr.org

npr.org

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

Louisiana Supreme Court Won't Review Life Sentence For Man Who Stole Hedge Clippers

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS