March 6, 20209 min read, 1752 words
Published: March 6, 2020 | 9 min read, 1752 words
By and , CNNLink Copied!Ad Feedback — A strict ban on the consumption and farming of wild animals is being rolled out across China in the wake of the , which is believed to have started at a wildlife market in Wuhan.Although it is unclear which animal transferred the vi...
CRITIC REVIEWS
There don't seem to be any reviews yet.
PUBLIC REVIEWS
Correlation w/o Causation
March 6, 2020
This article talks about the wildlife trade in China; however, there is no direct evidence as to what species was the direct cause of the COVID19 epidemic. A blanket ban on wildlife consumption makes less sense when you are unsure of the source. Some game animals may be fine, but the legislation banning all wildlife seems like a step toward forcing specific diet restrictions. Additionally, some species are kept in check from running rampant ecologically by hunting and predation from mankind, similar to deer in North America. The article does cover the perspective that this ban will be difficult to enforce in opposition to the original premise that the ban itself is a good thing.
March 6, 2020
Great Context
March 6, 2020
Wow, this is one of the best articles I've read on the coronavirus. Although it focuses on the Chinese consumption of wild animals, it dives into everything from the culture, medicine, prohibition, and the $73 billion industry. Fantastic and worthwhile read that speaks honestly about the situation in China without judgment or spin.
March 6, 2020