I actually came across this article when it first came out. Both the text and video try to do a basic breakdown of her question dodging and the strategy she brings to an interview. Not based on too much beside firsthand observation, which in itself is credible, but may be cherry-picked to purposefully display a certain image. Normally, I wouldn't suggest that this is newsworthy because it wouldn't normally impact our daily lives, but she is demonstrating a rhetoric with this new administration and setting a precedent that even those representing a presidential cabinet may not answer truthfully or in a trustworthy manner. We grew used to graceful composure under Obama, it appears. I would label this an opinion piece and fairly newsworthy due to its immediate political relevance and the potential for presenting self-anectodal evidence. Interesting perspective nonetheless.

Not much in the article but the video was instructive and entertaining.

The article itself is very brief, but the video at the top does a fantastic job of analyzing Kellyanne Conway's interview strategies.

Typical hit piece and not worth the time to read. Come on Vox. Use people who really wish to get to the meat of the facts. Kelly Conway is not the issue. Where is your balanced reporting of those in the CNN & MSNBC Stables???

Brief, yet informative and entertaining with a logical conclusion.

Interesting article on debate and question deflection. Carlos Maza cut together clips and examples of Conway's interviews with MSNBC, CNN, and others to support his claims. He also interviewed a national debate winner to get further insights. The video contains most of the article's information.

This seems more like a think piece than an article. It also presents a strong opinion that interviewing Kellyanne is useless. Even if you know what someone says is false or twisted doesn't make it uninformative.