The article is well-sourced and whether or not the reader likes the outcome of the provided list of "best exchanges", it's at least transparent since the author begins by stating what the determining factors are in the decision: "this article recommends four of the best crypto exchanges based on exchange score, average liquidity and trading volume."

Article is adequate but the metrics are biased toward the banking industry and compliant regulators which violates the spirit of cryptocurrency origin. The metrics merely measure ability to exchange for senseless currency that has transformed the cost of a candy bar from a nickel to a buck sixty four over the last fifty years. If your crypto-exchange is cooperative with a failing currency system, is the exchange providing a solution? Metrics based on volume and frequency of use are correlated with institutional investors which knocks the beauty out of the technology. Perhaps in the future, a different measurement could be provided such as which exchange will keep you from suffering the MacAfee dilemma, or which exchange vows to not cooperate with agents of governments. I say this in the most positive, upbeat manner I know.

This article does a decent job of giving us the pros and cons of the four best crypto exchanges.

A very balanced article giving the real pros and cons of the top four Crypto Exchanges.